<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AFT has apparently changed its tune regarding this blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=90" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:36:31 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: November 3 roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90&#038;cpage=1#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>November 3 roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90#comment-62</guid>
		<description>[...] Federation of Teachers backs off earlier aggressive trademark stance against critical website [AFT Exposed via Ron Coleman, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Federation of Teachers backs off earlier aggressive trademark stance against critical website [AFT Exposed via Ron Coleman, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Get The . Info &#187; Trademark Claims: The Option Of Choice For Censoring Critics &#8211; 1988th Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90&#038;cpage=1#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>You Get The . Info &#187; Trademark Claims: The Option Of Choice For Censoring Critics &#8211; 1988th Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90#comment-57</guid>
		<description>[...] tried to shut down a blog critical of the group using a trademark claim. While the AFT eventually backed down, after pretty much everyone made it clear that it had no chance to win a trademark claim against a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tried to shut down a blog critical of the group using a trademark claim. While the AFT eventually backed down, after pretty much everyone made it clear that it had no chance to win a trademark claim against a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trademark Claims: The Option Of Choice For Censoring Critics &#124; The-Informer</title>
		<link>http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90&#038;cpage=1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Trademark Claims: The Option Of Choice For Censoring Critics &#124; The-Informer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90#comment-56</guid>
		<description>[...] tried to shut down a blog critical of the group using a trademark claim. While the AFT eventually backed down, after pretty much everyone made it clear that it had no chance to win a trademark claim against a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tried to shut down a blog critical of the group using a trademark claim. While the AFT eventually backed down, after pretty much everyone made it clear that it had no chance to win a trademark claim against a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trademark Claims: The Option Of Choice For Censoring Critics &#124; Geek News and Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90&#038;cpage=1#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Trademark Claims: The Option Of Choice For Censoring Critics &#124; Geek News and Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90#comment-55</guid>
		<description>[...] tried to shut down a blog critical of the group using a trademark claim. While the AFT eventually backed down, after pretty much everyone made it clear that it had no chance to win a trademark claim against a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tried to shut down a blog critical of the group using a trademark claim. While the AFT eventually backed down, after pretty much everyone made it clear that it had no chance to win a trademark claim against a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trademark Claims: The Option Of Choice For Censoring Critics &#124; Tech News Direct</title>
		<link>http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90&#038;cpage=1#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Trademark Claims: The Option Of Choice For Censoring Critics &#124; Tech News Direct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90#comment-54</guid>
		<description>[...] tried to shut down a blog critical of the group using a trademark claim. While the AFT eventually backed down, after pretty much everyone made it clear that it had no chance to win a trademark claim against a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tried to shut down a blog critical of the group using a trademark claim. While the AFT eventually backed down, after pretty much everyone made it clear that it had no chance to win a trademark claim against a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Click World News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trademark Claims: The Option Of Choice For Censoring Critics</title>
		<link>http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90&#038;cpage=1#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Click World News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trademark Claims: The Option Of Choice For Censoring Critics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90#comment-53</guid>
		<description>[...] tried to shut down a blog critical of the group using a trademark claim. While the AFT eventually backed down, after pretty much everyone made it clear that it had no chance to win a trademark claim against a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tried to shut down a blog critical of the group using a trademark claim. While the AFT eventually backed down, after pretty much everyone made it clear that it had no chance to win a trademark claim against a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarlet Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90&#038;cpage=1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarlet Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t believe a word of it....the AFT is not for free speech.  They are a militant organization that cares only about the money they take from their member&#039;s pockets and they filter to their left-wing friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t believe a word of it&#8230;.the AFT is not for free speech.  They are a militant organization that cares only about the money they take from their member&#8217;s pockets and they filter to their left-wing friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90&#038;cpage=1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Glad to see the AFT is backing off some and I think it was good of you to meet them on the logo/shield portion of their complaint. I was going to suggest if push came to shove in a court of law you change the domain name to grAFTexposed dot com. 

Keep up the good work and I certainly hope some whistleblowers with a conscience come forward from their organization and the true AFT agenda is brought to light. Hiding behind the facade of &quot;It&#039;s for the children&quot; is reprehensible. If they were &#039;for the children&#039; they would not fight so hard to keep teachers that can&#039;t teach and to keep schools in substandard conditions. - Your &quot;non-educational&quot; page is very telling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see the AFT is backing off some and I think it was good of you to meet them on the logo/shield portion of their complaint. I was going to suggest if push came to shove in a court of law you change the domain name to grAFTexposed dot com. </p>
<p>Keep up the good work and I certainly hope some whistleblowers with a conscience come forward from their organization and the true AFT agenda is brought to light. Hiding behind the facade of &#8220;It&#8217;s for the children&#8221; is reprehensible. If they were &#8216;for the children&#8217; they would not fight so hard to keep teachers that can&#8217;t teach and to keep schools in substandard conditions. &#8211; Your &#8220;non-educational&#8221; page is very telling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® &#124; Trademark: The tort of choice for censors &#124; Ron Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90&#038;cpage=1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® &#124; Trademark: The tort of choice for censors &#124; Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aftexposed.com/blog/?p=90#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] may not be able to read, but the AFT knows how to interpret blog traffic logs.  They&#8217;ve backed down.   Cyber-shmear [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may not be able to read, but the AFT knows how to interpret blog traffic logs.  They&#8217;ve backed down.   Cyber-shmear [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
